Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

A feasible probability and graph model for memory engrams.

Hui Wei, Surun Yang, Yangwang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui WeiLaboratory of Algorithms for Cognitive Models, School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Surun YangLaboratory of Algorithms for Cognitive Models, School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yangwang LiLaboratory of Algorithms for Cognitive Models, School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity of long-term memory seems to be extremely large, capable of storing information spanning almost a lifetime. Why does it have such a vast capacity? Why are some memories so enduring? What is the actual physical form of long-term memory? In the movie Inside Out, it is depicted as individual orbs containing information. Is that really the case? Simply explaining this by saying that the cortex has many neurons, numerous neural connections, and complex electrochemical activity between them is not sufficient to answer these fundamental questions. We need to uncover the theory hidden behind these phenomena. In essence, a neural network is equivalent to a very large directed graph, with a massive number of nodes and directed connections. This paper posits that the physical form of long-term memory is a connected subgraph within this complex directed graph. This subgraph is capable of linking together the disparate fragments of the same event, spread across different sensory cortices, to form associations. This provides a physical realization of the engram theory. The robustness of the connected subgraph and the resources it consumes can explain various memory behaviors. Based on anatomical, brain imaging, and electrophysiological evidence, this paper constructs a probabilistic connectivity model and uses theorems from graph theory to prove the ease of constructing connected subgraphs. Finally, it explains why the potential capacity for memory is immense.

Indexed as

capacitydirected graphengram theorylong-term memoryprobability model

Identifiers

PMID42609398
PMCPMC13478142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.