ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
Development of a deep learning-based grid walking test for assessing post-stroke motor function in mice.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, affecting over 15 million people each year. Developing effective therapies depends on accurate, scalable methods to assess sensorimotor recovery in preclinical models. Standard motor tests like grid walking and ladder tests rely on manual scoring, limiting objectivity and throughput. To address this, we compared a commercially available automated ladder test with a newly developed deep learning-based grid walking test using DeepLabCut (DLC) in a photothrombotic stroke model in mice. Our results show that the automated ladder test system failed to detect significant unilateral deficits in stroke animals. It did not capture the expected increase in missteps in the affected forepaw after stroke, even though motor cortex infarcts were confirmed histologically, and the functional impairment was apparent with manual scoring in the grid walking test. In contrast, our DLC-based grid walking model provided fully automated quantification of this widely used test. It achieved millimeter-scale tracking accuracy and detected a ∼3-fold increase in foot faults in stroke-affected mice compared to controls, clearly differentiating between affected and unaffected forepaws for at least 2 weeks post-stroke. These findings expose the limitations of the commercial automated ladder test and demonstrate that the DLC-based pose-estimation-assisted misstep quantification in grid-walk test provides greater sensitivity for detecting motor deficit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.