Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Ecological governance and population subjective wellbeing: the mediating role of social trust.

Mengxia Wen, Rongqing Lu, Wenyuan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengxia WenShandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Rongqing LuSchool of Information Technology, Monash University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Wenyuan SunInstitute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Clementi, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although previous research has shown that governance quality is associated with subjective wellbeing, two gaps remain. First, governance is usually treated as an institutional performance construct, with limited attention to whether governance contexts that combine institutional quality and ecological performance are linked to population wellbeing. Second, the psychosocial pathway underlying this relationship remains underexplored, especially from an environmental psychology perspective that treats social and ecological contexts as conditions of lived wellbeing. This study addresses these gaps by examining ecological-philosophy-oriented governance, defined here as a composite macro-level governance orientation integrating governance quality and ecological performance. Using cross-national secondary data from 312 country-wave observations across 86 countries from 2005 to 2022, drawn from the WVS/EVS, WGI, and EPI, we tested whether social trust mediates the association between ecological-philosophy-oriented governance and population subjective wellbeing. The results showed that ecological-philosophy-oriented governance was positively associated with subjective wellbeing (β = 0.287,

Indexed as

ecological-philosophy-oriented governanceenvironmental psychologymediation analysispopulation subjective wellbeingsocial trust

Identifiers

PMID42609351
PMCPMC13477987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.