ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Image-based deep learning in otology: a state-of-the-art review.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Deep learning (DL), a core branch of artificial intelligence (AI), has revolutionized medical image analysis. Driven by advances in computational power and access to large-scale datasets, DL excels at extracting hierarchical features from complex, unstructured data. Accurate interpretation of imaging features is essential for diagnosing and treating middle and inner ear diseases. This narrative review aims to summarize current literature on the application of DL in otological imaging. Methods: A narrative literature search was conducted using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Keywords related to AI or DL in otology were used to identify relevant articles published up to the time of writing. Results: DL models have achieved favorable results in classifying common middle ear diseases (e.g., otitis media) using otoscopic images and in segmenting major inner ear structures (e.g., cochlea, ossicular chain) in 3D volumetric data. While 2D CNNs are mature for otoscopic classification, 3D U-Net and UNETR architectures dominate CT and MRI analysis. Models also show value in low-dose CT reconstruction and multimodal diagnosis. Conclusion: DL has demonstrated strong potential to improve clinical decision-making and healthcare efficiency in otology. However, the field faces challenges related to data scarcity for rare diseases, poor segmentation performance for tiny structures (e.g., stapes), and a lack of integration with clinical workflows. Future efforts should focus on standardizing data and optimizing network structures for specific modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.