ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The impact of delayed retirement on the financial sustainability of China's urban employee pension insurance fund.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of accelerating population aging and mounting concerns over the financial viability of public pension systems, this paper develops an actuarial simulation framework that integrates demographic dynamics, fund revenue and expenditure rules, and the central adjustment mechanism. We evaluate four scenarios: baseline, delayed retirement only, national pooling only, and the combined reform. Our findings indicate that in the absence of policy intervention, regional disparities in fund balances intensify markedly: the western region enters cumulative deficit first, followed by the central region, while the eastern region retains a longer but still finite reserve buffer. The delayed-retirement-only path does not by itself improve fiscal performance in the present calibration, whereas national pooling narrows current deficits and postpones reserve depletion in deficit regions. When the two reforms are implemented jointly, the combined scenario delivers the strongest overall performance and produces a positive interaction effect on both current and cumulative balances across all three regions. Sensitivity tests further show that pessimistic macro conditions, weaker collection, and lower fund return materially erode the gains, while province-level results reveal substantial heterogeneity within each region. To strengthen the long-run sustainability and institutional resilience of the urban employee pension insurance system, we recommend refining the design of the national pooling mechanism, advancing delayed retirement together with complementary labor-market measures, and adopting regionally differentiated implementation and dynamic adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.