ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
ORDER-DR: external validation of severity grading and referable-risk stratification from fundus images.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes, and fundus-image deep learning may support scalable screening and risk stratification. However, models trained on a single public dataset can show threshold shift when externally evaluated, limiting direct translation from internal accuracy to clinically interpretable risk. We developed ORDER-DR, a validation-calibrated dual-branch ordinal-risk framework for five-class DR severity grading and referable DR prediction from color fundus photographs. The final prespecified operating model used a high-resolution EfficientNet-B0 branch and a complementary lesion-order-sensitive risk (LORS) EfficientNet-B0 branch; checkpoints and decision thresholds were selected only from APTOS validation predictions. External validation was performed on 1,744 gradable Messidor-2 images. On held-out APTOS test splits, ORDER-DR achieved quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) 0.8960 ± 0.0049, macro-F1 0.6832 ± 0.0279, and accuracy 0.8352 ± 0.0118. On Messidor-2 with validation-calibrated thresholds, ORDER-DR achieved the strongest external ordinal agreement among the evaluated candidate models, with QWK 0.6423 ± 0.0364 and macro-F1 0.4578 ± 0.0332. The LORS branch retained higher external area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), indicating a tradeoff between ordinal grade agreement and referable-risk ranking. Reliability analysis showed a higher referable-risk expected calibration error on Messidor-2 than on APTOS test (0.160 ± 0.008 vs. 0.049 ± 0.001). These findings indicate robust external ordinal consistency for ORDER-DR across datasets and show that operational threshold performance, threshold-independent risk ranking, and probability calibration should be evaluated as complementary dimensions. The primary contribution is a locked and reproducible empirical evaluation framework for DR ordinal grading and referable-risk stratification, integrating high-resolution class-balanced discrimination, ordinal-risk modeling, validation-derived threshold calibration, and external error analysis. At the validation-selected referable-risk threshold, Messidor-2 performance showed a high-specificity operating profile; high-sensitivity screening use can be adapted through operating-point selection and calibration for the target clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.