Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609287›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

ORDER-DR: external validation of severity grading and referable-risk stratification from fundus images.

Quanwei Sheng, Qiyu Dong, Shuang Wu, Weijun Liang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quanwei ShengCollege of Information Engineering, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qiyu DongThe Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shuang WuThe Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Weijun LiangThe Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes, and fundus-image deep learning may support scalable screening and risk stratification. However, models trained on a single public dataset can show threshold shift when externally evaluated, limiting direct translation from internal accuracy to clinically interpretable risk. We developed ORDER-DR, a validation-calibrated dual-branch ordinal-risk framework for five-class DR severity grading and referable DR prediction from color fundus photographs. The final prespecified operating model used a high-resolution EfficientNet-B0 branch and a complementary lesion-order-sensitive risk (LORS) EfficientNet-B0 branch; checkpoints and decision thresholds were selected only from APTOS validation predictions. External validation was performed on 1,744 gradable Messidor-2 images. On held-out APTOS test splits, ORDER-DR achieved quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) 0.8960 ± 0.0049, macro-F1 0.6832 ± 0.0279, and accuracy 0.8352 ± 0.0118. On Messidor-2 with validation-calibrated thresholds, ORDER-DR achieved the strongest external ordinal agreement among the evaluated candidate models, with QWK 0.6423 ± 0.0364 and macro-F1 0.4578 ± 0.0332. The LORS branch retained higher external area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), indicating a tradeoff between ordinal grade agreement and referable-risk ranking. Reliability analysis showed a higher referable-risk expected calibration error on Messidor-2 than on APTOS test (0.160 ± 0.008 vs. 0.049 ± 0.001). These findings indicate robust external ordinal consistency for ORDER-DR across datasets and show that operational threshold performance, threshold-independent risk ranking, and probability calibration should be evaluated as complementary dimensions. The primary contribution is a locked and reproducible empirical evaluation framework for DR ordinal grading and referable-risk stratification, integrating high-resolution class-balanced discrimination, ordinal-risk modeling, validation-derived threshold calibration, and external error analysis. At the validation-selected referable-risk threshold, Messidor-2 performance showed a high-specificity operating profile; high-sensitivity screening use can be adapted through operating-point selection and calibration for the target clinical setting.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetic RetinopathyFundus OculiHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness Indexcalibrationdeep learningdiabetic retinopathyexternal validationfundus imageordinal classificationrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42609287
PMCPMC13477890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.