Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609258›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026

Data-centric strategies enable cross-center generalization of convolutional neural networks for CT brain extraction.

Zheng Sun, Lifang Ye, Yao Xu, Yuehua Li

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zheng Sun *School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Lifang Ye *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yao XuDepartment of Radiology, Liyang Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yuehua LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To determine if a small number of annotated scans can enable clinically meaningful adaptation of a pre-trained convolutional neural network across different centers. Using non-contrast head CT brain extraction as the test case, we also sought to identify the factors contributing to performance drops when applying models to new sites. Materials and methods: Non-contrast head CT scans were used in this study, from two separate institutions (Center A: 595 scans; Center B: 486 scans). A public pre-trained U-Net model for brain tissue extraction was first evaluated on Center A dataset as a baseline. The model was then fine-tuned incrementally using stratified subsets of annotated scans (5, 15, 25, and 75). The pre-trained model was subsequently transferred to Center B dataset and adapted through the same incremental fine-tuning strategy. The primary metric of interest was the three-dimensional Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), with a pre-defined minimal important difference (MID) set at 0.01. To identify predictors of baseline DSC and fine-tuning gain driving cross-center performance degradation, variance inflation factor (VIF) screening and logit Gaussian linear models (GLMs) were applied, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis providing qualitative feature importance rankings. Results: At center A, the pre-trained model achieved a DSC of 0.9634 ± 0.0151. Fine-tuning with five annotated scans raised DSC to 0.9784 ± 0.0070 ( Conclusion: For NCCT brain extraction assessed across two centers, fine-tuning a publicly pre-trained CNN using five local annotated scans can generate clinically valuable cross-center segmentation gains; slice thickness heterogeneity appears to be the dominant source of inter-center domain shift.

Indexed as

BrainConvolutional Neural NetworksTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumanscross-center generalizationCT brain tissue extractiondeep learningincremental fine-tuningU-Net

Identifiers

PMID42609258
PMCPMC13477930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.