ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Adaptation and Content Validation of the Adherence to Treatment of Neurological Physiotherapy Questionnaire (AdT-NeuroPhysio) in Spanish People with Stroke.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adherence to rehabilitation programmes is often poor after stroke, which limits functional recovery. Although adherence to rehabilitation programmes is frequently inadequate following a stroke and limits functional recovery, there is a need for more measures based on patient-reported information to assess this adherence. Purpose: This study aimed to adapt and validate the content of the Adherence to Treatment of Neurological Physiotherapy (AdT-NeuroPhysio) questionnaire for Spanish persons with subacute stroke. Patients and methods: After initial item adaptation by authors, a two-round Delphi study with 165 national stroke rehabilitation experts assessed relevance, comprehensibility, and content validity. Content Validity Indices (I-CVI, S-CVI), probability of chance agreement (Pc), and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) were calculated. Open-ended questions were proposed to gather author's extended opinion on items. Cognitive testing with 12 participants evaluated comprehensibility and feasibility. Results: After the two rounds, the AdT-NeuroPhysio demonstrated excellent content validity (I-CVI range: 0.80-0.98; S-CVI=0.90), negligible chance agreement, and good internal consistency (α=0.819). The compliance subscale showed high consistency (α=0.804), while the beliefs subscale was acceptable (α=0.685). Two open-ended sections on environmental barriers/facilitators were added. In the pilot study, participants found the questionnaire highly comprehensible (S-CVI=1), feasible, and easy to complete (mean time: ~3 minutes). Conclusion: The AdT-NeuroPhysio is a content-validated, comprehensible and feasible assessment for evaluating therapeutic adherence from the patient's perspective in Spanish subacute stroke populations. Further psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.