Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609192›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Cholangioscopy-guided ERCP: expanding diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Shengjie Yang, Hongyu Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shengjie YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changxing County People's Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hongyu LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changxing County People's Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains a cornerstone technique for the management of pancreaticobiliary diseases, but conventional ERCP relies largely on fluoroscopic images and cannot directly evaluate intraductal mucosal abnormalities. Cholangioscopy has expanded the diagnostic and therapeutic scope of ERCP by enabling direct visualization of the biliary tree, targeted tissue acquisition, and visual control of intraductal interventions. The technology has evolved from early dual-operator mother-baby systems to single-operator cholangioscopy, high-resolution digital disposable platforms, direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscopes, and emerging systems such as EyeMax/EYEMAX with larger working channels and improved intraductal access. Clinically, cholangioscopy-guided ERCP is most established for indeterminate biliary strictures and difficult bile duct stones. In indeterminate strictures, cholangioscopy should be interpreted within a multimodality diagnostic framework that includes cross-sectional imaging, conventional ERCP-based sampling, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition, and cholangioscopy-guided visual assessment and biopsy. In difficult stones, cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy improves targeted fragmentation and duct clearance when conventional ERCP techniques fail. Emerging applications include assessment of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct, screening or surveillance of risk-enriched intraductal neoplasms, primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated strictures, post-transplant biliary complications, complex stent guidance, and selected gallbladder interventions. This review summarizes the evolution of cholangioscopy technology, procedural considerations, current evidence, clinical outcomes, safety issues, and future directions including image-enhanced endoscopy and artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation.

Indexed as

cholangioscopydifficult bile duct stonesdigital single-operator cholangioscopydirect peroral cholangioscopyendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEyeMaxindeterminate biliary strictures

Identifiers

PMID42609192
PMCPMC13477893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.