Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609155›Full record

ReviewLab on a chip2026

From flow to form: structuring and patterning hydrogels using microfluidic approaches.

Ella E Bouker, Lauren G Brown, Emilie Newsham Novak, Ariel Lin, Jamison M Whitten, Asha R Viswanathan, Laura A Milton, M Yunos Alizai, Siwan Park, Jungseub Lee and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab on a chip, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ella E BoukerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9855-8646
Lauren G BrownDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-2691
Emilie Newsham NovakDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Ariel LinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0443-3987
Jamison M WhittenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Asha R ViswanathanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Laura A MiltonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
M Yunos AlizaiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Siwan ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. njeon@snu.ac.kr.
Jungseub LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. njeon@snu.ac.kr.
Liam A KnudsenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Sophie R CookDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Yi-Chin TohSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-4852
Jean BerthierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Amanda J HaackDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.
Noo Li JeonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. njeon@snu.ac.kr.
Erwin BerthierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-9034
Ashleigh B ThebergeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA. erwin.berthier@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3394-1435

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002318 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Megan Moore · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
Theberge Admin Supp Undergraduate Summer Research ExperiencesR35GM128648 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ashleigh Brooks Theberge · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
Generating multilayered engineered heart tissue patches to mimic physiological thickness and function using open microfluidicsF30HL158030 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAACK, AMANDA JEAN · 2021 to 2025
$192k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002318NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL158030NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture can leverage the precise arrangement of materials, known as patterning, to generate physiologically relevant tissue-like structures. Hydrogels are widely used in 3D cell culture due to their ability to mimic the properties of biological extracellular matrix networks. In this tutorial review, we discuss the use of microfluidic systems to control fluid movement and placement within fabricated microchannels to pattern hydrogel precursors in 3D through the use of capillary flow. Such systems offer unique advantages in their ability to create complex biomimetic structures, organs-on-a-chip, and microphysiological systems with high spatial resolution and relatively small volumes of hydrogel material. We first discuss the fundamental principles behind capillary pinning and aspiration-mediated patterning. We then review literature describing the development and applications of three different types of microfluidic systems - closed, semi-open, and open - and describe how different patterning techniques are applied to each system. We also discuss modular microfluidic systems, in which multiple classes of microfluidic systems are combined together for complex and biomimetic modeling of biological systems. In each section, we provide synthesis and critical analysis of established and novel techniques to draw connections across diverse papers in literature. Finally, we offer our perspectives on the advantages of microfluidic systems for hydrogel patterning and the future of the field. Taken together, microfluidic flow-based patterning is an exciting tool for microphysiological systems and other 3D cell culture models that are poised to transform our understanding of basic biological mechanisms and provide new opportunities for studying diverse phenomena in physiologically relevant tissue models.

Indexed as

HydrogelsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesAnimalsCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalHumansMicrophysiological SystemsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID42609155
PMCPMC13482385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.