ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Prioritizing Shark, Ray, and Chimaera Conservation in Rapidly Changing Polar Waters.
Vanessa B Bettcher, Amanda Batlle-Morera, Peter M Kyne, Ryan Charles, Emiliano García-Rodríguez, Christoph A Rohner, Asia O Armstrong, Margaret O'Leary Amsler, Natalia V Chernova, Brynn M Devine and 17 more
Abstract read
In one paragraphArticle in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
27 authors.
Vanessa B BettcherInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-5663 Amanda Batlle-MoreraInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-0275-8299 Peter M KyneInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-4494-2625 Ryan CharlesInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-2137 Emiliano García-RodríguezInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-9078-1300 Christoph A RohnerInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-8972 Asia O ArmstrongInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-0598 Margaret O'Leary AmslerDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7196-1576 Natalia V ChernovaZoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3955-7511 Andrey V DolgovLaboratory of Hydrobiology, Polar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Murmansk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4806-3284 Meghan M DonovanCentre for Fisheries Ecosystems Research, Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-2047 Johanna FaureCIMAR/CIIMAR-LA, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros Do Porto de Leixões, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8735-5987 Brittany FinucciInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-2946 Jonathan A D FisherCentre for Fisheries Ecosystems Research, Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Rachel A S ForbesCentre for Fisheries Ecosystems Research, Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4136-0836 Kevin J HedgesArctic Fisheries and Marine Mammal Science Division, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-2360 Nigel E HusseyInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-9050-6077 David W KulkaInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-5460-3400 Alexei M OrlovInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-0877-2553 Clara PéronLaboratoire de Biologie des Organismes et Écosystèmes Aquatiques (UMR 8067 BOREA), Muséum National d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6529-4578 Matthias SchaberInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-4626 Simon WeigmannInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-6630 Rima W JabadoInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-6239-6723 Funding
Shark Conservation Fund
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Climate-driven alterations in sea-ice dynamics and shifting fishing activity are reshaping ecosystems across the Arctic and Antarctic, yet conservation-relevant information for chondrichthyans (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) remains limited. We present the first assessment of Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRAs) across Polar Waters, integrating species distributions, extinction risk, critical habitat evidence, spatial protection coverage, apparent fishing effort (2013-2018 vs. 2019-2024), and sea-ice concentration trends. Of 86 chondrichthyan species reported from Polar Waters, only 15 (17.4%) had sufficient evidence to meet the ISRA Criteria, and 28 (32.6%) are threatened with extinction. We identified 35 ISRAs (27 Arctic; 8 Antarctic) covering 0.75% of the Polar Waters region. ISRAs were delineated predominantly based on data from scientific fishing surveys and harvest fisheries. Most Antarctic ISRAs were delineated under Criterion B-Range Restricted, reflecting endemism and scarce life-history evidence. Major knowledge gaps persist, particularly for highly adapted Polar Species (10 species) and deepwater taxa (72.1% of regional chondrichthyan fauna). Between 2013 and 2024, the spatial footprint of fishing expanded in both poles for trawlers and longliners, despite stable or declining fishing hours in some fleets. Concurrent areas of increasing fishing effort and decreasing sea-ice concentration remained minimal. However, apparent fishing effort overlapped with most ISRAs, indicating ongoing fishing pressure in critical habitats. Marine Protected Area (MPA) coverage remains uneven: 8.2% of Arctic ISRA spatial extent overlaps MPAs (0.8% no-take), compared with 43.8% in the Antarctic (14.8% no-take), with insufficient effective coverage in areas beyond national jurisdiction. These results reveal substantial mismatches between chondrichthyan critical habitats, fishing exposure, and existing protection measures. Integrating ISRAs into existing management frameworks, such as Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework, High Seas Treaty mechanisms, and fisheries governance bodies, will be essential to safeguard vulnerable polar chondrichthyans as sea-ice concentration declines and exposure risk increases.
Indexed as
Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesSharksSkates, FishAnimalsAntarctic RegionsArctic RegionsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesFisheriesIce CoverAntarcticArcticchondrichthyansImportant Shark and Ray Areas (ISRAs)marine spatial planning
Identifiers
PMID42609083
PMCPMC13482297
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390