Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608957›Full record

ArticleJBI evidence synthesis2026

Children's and parents' use of diabetes technologies in the primary school environment: a scoping review.

Tracey O'Neill, Karen McTague, Thelma Begley, Sonam Banka-Cullen, Eleanor Hollywood

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JBI evidence synthesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tracey O'NeillSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-8156
Karen McTagueSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-7651
Thelma BegleySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-6367
Sonam Banka-CullenSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-3605
Eleanor HollywoodSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-2334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis scoping review aimed to map the evidence on the use of diabetes technologies by primary school children (aged 6 to 12 years) with type 1 diabetes and their parents in primary school settings. Specifically, it aimed to identify the types of technologies used, who is responsible for managing and supporting their use, and the benefits and challenges associated with their use during the school day.

introductionTechnological advances in diabetes care have revolutionized the management of diabetes, but their integration into school settings introduces new challenges for children, parents, and school staff. Evidence about their use during the primary school day remains fragmented. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies, as well as systematic reviews, that included children aged 6 to 12 years or their parents and focused on the use of diabetes technologies in the primary school environment were eligible for inclusion. Gray literature was also considered.

methodsA search for relevant records was conducted in April 2025 across CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Embase (Embase.com), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. Gray and unpublished literature were searched in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently screened titles, and abstracts, and full-text sources. The findings are presented in tables, accompanied by a basic content analysis and a descriptive narrative summary based on the review questions.

resultsTwenty-three studies were included in this review: 15 qualitative studies, 4 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Studies were conducted in multiple countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Canada, Poland, Belgium, and Turkey. There were also 2 multicountry sources. Publication years ranged from 2004 to 2025. Results from child and parent reports showed that continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion devices, continuous glucose monitoring, flash glucose monitoring, and hybrid closed-loop systems are being used by children in the primary school environment. These technologies are managed during the school day through a collaborative approach, involving the children, their parents, and various school personnel. The benefits of using diabetes technology in the primary school environment were identified across 4 main categories: i) improved school participation, academic engagement, and social-emotional well-being; ii) increased independence, confidence, and self-management; iii) enhanced safety and monitoring; and iv) reduced burden on parents and school staff. The challenges were identified across 4 categories: i) device-related challenges; ii) social stigma and peer interaction ; iii) school personnel competency and training; and iv) parental stress and family.

conclusionsThis scoping review offers insights into the use of diabetes technology during the primary school day from the perspectives of children and their parents. It highlights that diabetes technology can support children's inclusion, autonomy, and confidence during school. It also highlights the need for structured training for school personnel, clear role delineation, and supportive school policies to ensure the safe and sustainable use of technology. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF https://osf.io/fhw3x.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1ParentsSchoolsBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildFemaleHumansInsulin Infusion SystemsMalechildrendiabetes technologyparentsprimary schoolstype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42608957
PMCPMC13649272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.