Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608854›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026

Nurses' Actions of Maintaining Patient Dignity: An Integrative Review.

Elina Paala, Sanna Koskinen, Minna Stolt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elina PaalaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5218-0216
Sanna KoskinenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-3162
Minna StoltDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-9800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDignity is both an objective, intrinsic right and a subjective experience that forms through interaction with other people. Humane care is a precondition for nurses' ethics practice and maintaining patients' dignity. During care, patients' dignity is maintained through nurses' actions. However, acute care settings are particularly challenging environments for maintaining patients' dignity.

aimThe aim of this study was to review previous research to identify nurses' actions that provide humane care and maintain patients' dignity in acute care settings, and to synthesize evidence on how nurses enact dignified humane care.

methodsThis integrative review followed the approach by Whittemore and Knafl and is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo. The selected articles were analysed using inductive content analysis.

resultsThirty-one articles were included in the review. Nurses' actions demonstrating humane care and maintaining patients' dignity formed five categories: Respecting the patient as a unique individual, Being present to the patient's expressions and experiences, Giving the patient the opportunity to be involved and in control, Protecting the patient's integrity and physical boundaries and Providing individual and appropriate care considering the patient's vulnerability.

conclusionsPatients' dignity is maintained through everyday nursing actions. Providing humane care and maintaining patients' dignity requires that nurses are genuinely present with the patient to recognise their unique experience.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsNurse's RolePersonhoodHumansdignityintegrative reviewnurses' actions

Identifiers

PMID42608854
PMCPMC13481997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.