Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608710›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

BAGLS-VF: a comprehensive dataset for glottal area and vocal fold segmentations.

Sina Razi, Andreas M Kist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sina RaziDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas M KistDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. andreas.kist@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-7776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDatasets for automatic analysis of laryngeal endoscopic images are scarce, particularly those providing detailed anatomical annotations beyond the glottal area. The BAGLS dataset previously introduced a large collection of laryngoscopic images with expert annotations of the glottal area. To facilitate research on more detailed anatomical modeling and segmentation tasks, we introduce BAGLS-VF, an extension of the BAGLS dataset that includes additional annotations of the left and right vocal folds. DATA DESCRIPTION: BAGLS-VF contains 59,250 videolaryngoscopic frames with pixel-level annotations of three anatomical structures: glottal area, left vocal fold, and right vocal fold. The dataset is derived from the original BAGLS dataset and was semi-automatically annotated by a trained rater using a standardized annotation protocol. Images originate from high-speed videolaryngoscopic recordings of subjects undergoing clinical examination and cover a wide range of anatomical variability and imaging conditions. In line with the original BAGLS dataset, the images are predominantly grayscale (approximately 97% of the underlying recordings) with a small proportion of RGB recordings (approximately 3%); the segmentation masks are provided as RGB-encoded label images in which the three anatomical regions are stored as separate colour channels. BAGLS-VF is intended to support research in medical image segmentation, laryngeal biomechanics, and computer-assisted diagnosis.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualGlottisImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLaryngoscopyVocal CordsHumansVideo RecordingAnatomyBAGLSDatasetDysphoniaHigh-speed videoendoscopyLaryngeal endoscopyQuantitative laryngologySpeechVocal foldsVoice

Identifiers

PMID42608710
PMCPMC13480099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.