Observational studyBMC health services research2026
Strengthening the patient perspective in quality development: a mixed-methods observational study on suitability of the PROMIS GH-10 in Swiss inpatient rehabilitation.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHealthcare systems increasingly use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to complement traditional clinical and performance-based outcomes by capturing health outcomes from the patient perspective and supporting quality improvement and patient-centred care. In Switzerland, the National competence centre for quality measurements in hospitals and clinics ANQ performs the external quality development program. We conducted a nationwide pilot study in inpatient rehabilitation using the generic PROMIS GH-10 to assess its suitability as an outcome for quality development by evaluating its responsiveness and feasibility of implementation in everyday clinical practice.
methodsOur study applied a mixed-method observational design. In a multi-stage expert-based selection process, the PROMIS GH-10 was selected for piloting. In total, 28 rehabilitation clinics recruited patients during the study period and asked them to fill in the PROMIS GH-10 digitally or paper-based at admission and discharge. After the survey, healthcare professionals (HCPs) were asked to document the level of assistance required by patients. Mean T-scores and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated. Assistance requirements were analysed using descriptive statistics. Additionally, qualitative interviews were completed with HCPs to assess facilitating factors and barriers to implementation.
resultsA sample of 2,083 patients was included, resulting in 1,217 complete pre-post measurements. Mean T-scores (SD) for PROMIS GH-10 subscales physical health (PHS) and mental health (MHS) significantly improved (p < 0.001) from admission to discharge (total sample PHS: 39.3(7.4); 44.4(7.6); d = 0.68; MHS: 44.9(8.0); 48.7(7.5); d = 0.48). Effect sizes on PHS ranged from d = 0.50-0.95 and on MHS from d = 0.33-1.19. Overall, 41% of patients required assistance in answering the PROM. Barriers to implementation from HCP perspective included uncertainties about the benefit of a generic PROM and the lack of staff resources. Facilitators were the questionnaire's brevity and the value of including the patient perspective.
conclusionsPROMIS GH-10 showed significant pre-post effects on physical and mental health in Swiss inpatient rehabilitation. Nonetheless, barriers such as increased time needed for assistance in special patient groups should be considered before national implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.