ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026
Time-dependent analysis of HUS change in older patients aged > 75 years with head and neck cancer.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious longitudinal evidence has suggested that patients aged > 75 years may be associated with a poorer Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) trajectory. We compared the longitudinal health utility scores (HUS) of older (>75 years) versus younger patients with head and neck cancers across various clinical subgroups and identified factors associated with decline in quality of life.
methodsThe study prospectively collected clinical information and follow-up data from head and neck cancer patients. The HUI-3 scale was used to assess changes in health-related quality of life at baseline, post-surgery, mid-radiation therapy, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. A linear mixed model was employed to evaluate the changes in HUS and age categories over time.
resultsWe included 859 patients with head and neck cancer, of whom 647 were included in the longitudinal analytic cohort. In descriptive analyses, patients aged > 75 years showed less complete recovery in mean HUS after early treatment-related decline compared with younger patients. In the primary mixed-effects model, younger age groups had more positive average HUS slopes than patients aged > 75 years. However, these age-related differences were attenuated and were no longer statistically supported after adjustment for clinical stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and treatment modality. Subgroup findings were exploratory and were not consistently supported across all model-based comparisons.
conclusionPatients aged > 75 years may be at risk for slower or incomplete post-treatment recovery in HUI-3-derived health utility. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given potential selection bias, missing data, and attenuation after covariate adjustment. Larger studies with detailed geriatric and domain-specific functional measures are needed to confirm these patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.