ArticleBMC nursing2026
Moral distress and associated factors among nurses working in public hospitals in West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMoral distress occurs when nurses recognize an ethically appropriate action but feel unable to act due to institutional or systemic constraints. It is a major concern in nursing practice because ethical conflicts, limited autonomy, inadequate resources, and poor organizational support may affect nurses' well-being and quality of patient care. Evidence on moral distress in Ethiopia remains limited. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of moral distress and factors associated with moral distress among nurses working in public hospitals in the West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia.
methodsAn analytical cross-sectional study was conducted from February 13 to March 2, 2023, among 349 nurses selected by simple random sampling from four public hospitals. Nurses with at least six months of work experience were included, while those unavailable during data collection were excluded. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire comprising the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R) and measures of personal and environmental factors. Data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Moral distress was categorized into low and high levels using the sample mean. Factors associated with moral distress were identified using logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsOf the 349 eligible nurses, 344 participated (98.5% response rate). The mean (± SD) age of respondents was 31.92 ± 7.0 years, and 194 (55.6%) were female. Overall, 73.1% of nurses experienced high moral distress. Male nurses were less likely to experience high moral distress compared with female nurses (AOR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27-0.91). Nurses who were dissatisfied with their jobs had nearly eight times higher odds of experiencing high moral distress (AOR = 7.67 [3.08, 19.12]). Similarly, nurses working in a non-conducive environment had four times higher odds of experiencing high moral distress (AOR = 4.07 [1.92, 8.65]).
conclusionsA high proportion of nurses experienced moral distress in West Arsi Zone public hospitals. Improving job satisfaction and creating supportive work environments may help reduce moral distress and improve nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.