ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2026
Moving Toward Universalism? The Future of Long-Term Care in the United States.
Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Policy Points America's long-term care system is largely poverty-based, requiring most older adults to spend down their assets to qualify for limited, Medicaid-funded support, which is biased toward institutional care and plagued by bureaucratic complexity and enrollment hurdles. There are now, however, some promising changes. First, though access to home care still is more difficult than access to institutional care, the use of Medicaid home care services has grown significantly since the 1980s. Most promising is Washington State's innovative new universal social long-term care insurance program. Broad-based, compulsory social insurance has proved effective in other countries-lessening poverty-induced eligibility hurdles, increasing access to care (especially in communities), and mitigating political vulnerabilities associated with targeted policies. CONTEXT: America's long-term care policy approach is poverty-based, requiring most older adults to spend down their assets to qualify for limited, Medicaid-funded support, which is biased toward institutional care and plagued by bureaucratic complexity and enrollment hurdles.
methodsI conduct a review of long-term care policy developments since the 1980s, as well as related research on the impacts of these varying policy approaches on access to services.
findingsWhile Medicaid-funding long-term care remains plagued by complexity and access issues, there have been promising changes. Use of home and community-based services has increased substantially for Medicaid beneficiaries since the early 1980s due in large part to activism on the part of disability rights movement. Though new and still relatively limited in scope, the most promising change has been the recent adoption of a universal long-term care policy in Washington State.
conclusionsAs the population ages and care needs grow more urgent, the United States faces a critical choice-cling to a piecemeal, confusing, and impoverishing long-term care system or embrace universalism to ensure meaningful access to needed community-based long-term care supports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.