ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026
Sequential intraoperative protocol to improve bulbocavernosus reflex monitorability during pediatric spinal surgery.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring assesses sacral S2 to S4 pathway integrity during pediatric spinal surgery; however, its intraoperative utility is limited when responses are absent or unilateral. We prospectively evaluated a sequential intraoperative protocol designed to improve the interpretation of these patterns and reduce uncertainty during sacral monitoring.
methodsWe prospectively studied 242 consecutive pediatric patients aged 0.4-12 years who underwent spinal surgery between 2023 and 2025. Bilateral external anal sphincter (EAS) recordings were obtained using subdermal-needle electrodes. Intramuscular placement was verified using tetanic stimulation. BCR responses were elicited using single-train stimulation (STS), followed by double-train stimulation (DTS). A persistent absence with failed EAS verification was classified as a pattern consistent with efferent nonacquisition, whereas a persistent absence despite preserved verification was classified as a pattern consistent with afferent nonacquisition.
resultsFinal BCR acquisition was achieved in 225 of 242 patients (93.0%; 95% CI, 89.3-95.7). STS produced bilateral responses in 61.2% of patients, whereas DTS increased bilateral acquisition to 87.2%, rescued 57.5% of initially absent responses, and converted 81.5% of unilateral responses to bilateral responses. Persistent absence was observed in 17 patients (7.0%), including nine patterns consistent with efferent nonacquisition and eight with afferent nonacquisition. Younger age was independently associated with persistent absence.
conclusionA sequential protocol that combines EAS verification with DTS improves the intraoperative interpretation of BCR findings during pediatric spinal surgery. It provides a practical framework for interpreting absent or unilateral responses and reducing uncertainty when nonacquisition persists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.