ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
A proposed organization of multifaceted knowledge in data repositories: structuring record collections and evidence sets for data lakehouses and moonshots.
Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe are developing a cloud-based neurohealth data platform to aggregate and store data from large, complementary historical and ongoing studies focused on traumatic brain injury (TBI), a condition shaped by complex interactions among biological, environmental and contextual factors, and to enable secure, flexible querying across studies. These multifaceted datasets span clinical, physiological, behavioral, and environmental domains, mirroring the complexity of comparable multisite efforts such as the exposome moonshot.
objectiveDefine a scalable and interoperable framework for organizing and harmonizing multifaceted data derived from different sources, purposes, and time scales, supporting precision neurohealth research and translational applications.
methodsWe designed and have begun implementing the Precision Health for Enhanced Neuro-Operational Modeling (PHENOM) platform, using a hybrid lakehouse architecture deployed on the public cloud. PHENOM employs automated extract-transform-load pipelines, metadata templates, and standardized biomedical terminologies to support FAIR-compliant data integration and cross-domain interoperability. We have mapped our findings to our datasets of interest in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to the knowledge being generated for moonshot exposome efforts.
resultsThe PHENOM framework organizes data into four general "bins": (1) One-time capture, (2) regular or continual lab or site visits, (3) personalized electronic health records, and (4) collective measures. The architecture enables ingesting multimodal data and supports AI-driven analytic tools and digital twin modeling through public cloud services. Initial deployment has demonstrated automated harmonization across multiple TBI studies and scalable query performance across datasets. SIGNIFICANCE: Scientists supported through large research programs, such as those funded by government initiatives or consortia, are increasingly encouraged (or required) to share their diverse data in public repositories in FAIR format. The proposed framework provides a flexible, cloud-based platform that meets these requirements by enabling the harmonization and secure sharing of multifaceted data across studies. Designed for scalability and interoperability with established data models, the platform supports both current research needs and a flexible structure responsive to those needs for use across future large-scale precision health initiatives. IMPACT STATEMENT: This Perspective proposes a cloud framework for structuring multifaceted data derived from complementary or consortia-related studies using four general "bins": (1) One-time capture, (2) regular or continual lab or site visits, (3) personalized health records, and (4) collective measures. The proposed framework offers a flexible structure for use across many existing research programs that are increasingly encouraged (or required) to share their diverse data in public repositories in FAIR format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42608552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.