Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608552›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

A proposed organization of multifaceted knowledge in data repositories: structuring record collections and evidence sets for data lakehouses and moonshots.

Adam W Kiefer, Snigdha Sompalli, Jason P Mihalik, Robert Hubal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam W KieferMatthew Gfeller Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. awkiefer@email.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-3349
Snigdha SompalliMatthew Gfeller Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jason P MihalikMatthew Gfeller Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Robert HubalWisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe are developing a cloud-based neurohealth data platform to aggregate and store data from large, complementary historical and ongoing studies focused on traumatic brain injury (TBI), a condition shaped by complex interactions among biological, environmental and contextual factors, and to enable secure, flexible querying across studies. These multifaceted datasets span clinical, physiological, behavioral, and environmental domains, mirroring the complexity of comparable multisite efforts such as the exposome moonshot.

objectiveDefine a scalable and interoperable framework for organizing and harmonizing multifaceted data derived from different sources, purposes, and time scales, supporting precision neurohealth research and translational applications.

methodsWe designed and have begun implementing the Precision Health for Enhanced Neuro-Operational Modeling (PHENOM) platform, using a hybrid lakehouse architecture deployed on the public cloud. PHENOM employs automated extract-transform-load pipelines, metadata templates, and standardized biomedical terminologies to support FAIR-compliant data integration and cross-domain interoperability. We have mapped our findings to our datasets of interest in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to the knowledge being generated for moonshot exposome efforts.

resultsThe PHENOM framework organizes data into four general "bins": (1) One-time capture, (2) regular or continual lab or site visits, (3) personalized electronic health records, and (4) collective measures. The architecture enables ingesting multimodal data and supports AI-driven analytic tools and digital twin modeling through public cloud services. Initial deployment has demonstrated automated harmonization across multiple TBI studies and scalable query performance across datasets. SIGNIFICANCE: Scientists supported through large research programs, such as those funded by government initiatives or consortia, are increasingly encouraged (or required) to share their diverse data in public repositories in FAIR format. The proposed framework provides a flexible, cloud-based platform that meets these requirements by enabling the harmonization and secure sharing of multifaceted data across studies. Designed for scalability and interoperability with established data models, the platform supports both current research needs and a flexible structure responsive to those needs for use across future large-scale precision health initiatives. IMPACT STATEMENT: This Perspective proposes a cloud framework for structuring multifaceted data derived from complementary or consortia-related studies using four general "bins": (1) One-time capture, (2) regular or continual lab or site visits, (3) personalized health records, and (4) collective measures. The proposed framework offers a flexible structure for use across many existing research programs that are increasingly encouraged (or required) to share their diverse data in public repositories in FAIR format.

Indexed as

Data repositoriesData structureFAIR principlesMultifaceted dataShared knowledge bases

Identifiers

PMID42608552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.