ReviewMolecular biomedicine2026
Cold and hot tumors: immunological determinants, cancer-immunity cycle dysregulation, and nanotechnology-driven therapeutic approaches.
Review in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a major global health burden and the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy have emphasized the critical role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in determining therapeutic outcomes, leading to the classification of tumors into immunologically "hot" and "cold" phenotypes. Cold tumors are characterized by low immunogenicity, limited immune cell infiltration, and a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment, resulting in poor prognosis and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Despite the development of multiple immunotherapeutic strategies, effective activation of antitumor immunity in cold tumors remains a major clinical challenge. Current approaches aim to initiate immune responses through priming strategies such as cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell transfer, while simultaneously overcoming immunosuppressive signaling via immune checkpoint blockade. Additional strategies include depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhancement of co-stimulatory pathways. However, these approaches are often limited by inefficient delivery, poor tumor penetration, and systemic toxicity. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising platform for tumor microenvironment reprogramming. Nanocarriers enable targeted delivery of immunomodulatory agents, enhance antigen presentation, and improve immune activation while overcoming biological barriers such as dense stroma and abnormal vasculature. By integrating nanotechnology with immunotherapy, new opportunities arise to convert cold tumors into hot, immune-responsive phenotypes, thereby improving therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.