ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Design, Optimization and Evaluation of Taste-Masked Acemetacin Formulations Using Purolite A430MR.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A favorable taste is highly desirable for oral formulations, as an unpleasant bitter taste can severely compromise patient compliance. Acemetacin (ACM) is a bitter and poorly soluble drug, posing a significant challenge for oral administration. In this study, Purolite A430MR (A430MR) was employed to mask the bitterness of ACM via a precipitation method, forming ACM-A430MR resin composites (ARCs). A 1:1 weight ratio of ACM to A430MR was identified as the optimized formulation, achieving favorable drug loading and process yield. The ARCs
Indexed as
Identifiers
42608502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.