ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2026
When the hive speaks: detecting Varroa destructor infestation in honey bees through acoustic biomarkers and machine learning.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies are essential for agricultural production and ecosystem services but are increasingly threatened by multiple stressors, particularly the parasitic mite Varroa destructor, one of the major causes of global colony losses. Early and reliable detection of infestations is therefore critical for effective colony management. In this study, we investigated continuous hive acoustics as a non-invasive approach for the early detection of Varroa infestations. Approximately 960,000 timestamped acoustic recordings were collected from 53 colonies, of which only recordings temporally matched to available Varroa assessments (May-August 2020) were retained for model development. Each recording was temporally aligned with field-based Varroa measurements, and classification models were developed using 19 acoustic features derived from frequency bands and signal intensity. Among the tested algorithms, Random Forest achieved the highest performance (accuracy: 89.7%, AUC: 0.964), followed by XGBoost (82.4%, 0.908) and LightGBM (77.0%, 0.866). Permutation importance analysis revealed that low- to mid-frequency components, particularly within the 122-396 Hz range, served as sensitive acoustic indicators of Varroa presence. These findings demonstrate that hive acoustics capture biologically meaningful acoustic signatures associated with Varroa infestation status and highlight their potential as a scalable, non-invasive decision-support tool for early detection and improved colony management in apiculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42608498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.