ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Informed nondissent: an underutilized tool for the NICU context.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informed nondissent is a form of shared decision-making in which clinicians provide a medically appropriate recommendation while observing for explicit objection, rather than requiring affirmative agreement. This approach emphasizes transparency, clinician responsibility, and the opportunity for dissent. Clinicians and parents in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are frequently tasked with values-based, emotionally charged goals-of-care decisions for critically ill newborns with poor prognoses. When NICU parents indirectly express readiness to change goals of care without explicitly verbalizing it, prudent use of informed nondissent can improve alignment between parental values and goals and clinical care, prevent decisional conflict, and decrease moral distress. In this paper, we critically examine the benefits of informed nondissent and offer practical guidance for its effective application within NICU shared decision-making. We address its potential pitfalls, emphasizing that informed nondissent must be applied carefully to preserve parental authority and maintain parental ability to participate in decision-making.
Identifiers
42608447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.