ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel AI system for preliminary triage support in single-tooth edentulous spaces using intraoral images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to demonstrate the integration of deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) using only occlusal photographs to provide preliminary triage support between orthodontic and prosthodontic treatments in cases requiring alternatives to implant-based interventions. Occlusal photographs (n = 2,962) were collected under routine conditions using smartphones and digital cameras. Two groups of dental specialists independently annotated the dataset. A YOLOv8m model was used for the localization of single-tooth edentulous spaces (S-TES), which were defined as localized areas within the dental arch where a single tooth is absent while adjacent teeth remain present, as well as their mesial and distal adjacent teeth. ResNet-50/ResNet-101 and VGG-16/VGG-19 models were employed to classify the clinical conditions and anatomical categories of teeth adjacent to S-TES. A deterministic function converted the mesiodistal width of the S-TES from pixels to millimeters using mean central incisor widths. Logistic Regression (LR) and XGBoost (XGB) models were used to predict the preliminary triage outputs. Among the classifiers for the clinical tooth condition classification task, VGG-19 showed the highest macro F1 score (0.928) and ResNet-101 yielded the highest macro AUC (0.961) and weighted kappa (0.927), with the narrowest 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for both metrics. For the anatomical categorization task, ResNet-101 showed the highest F1 score, recall, and precision. For the triage support models, LR showed the highest AUC (0.896) with an expected calibration error (ECE) of 0.041, and XGB demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.869), sensitivity (0.874), and specificity (0.862) with an ECE of 0.024. The proof-of-concept demonstrates that the integration of DL and ML can achieve acceptable performance for preliminary triage support between orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment from occlusal images, within the acknowledged limitations. Further research is needed to improve model generalizability. However, the findings indicate a promising direction for future work. While in the long term, such technology has the potential to support preliminary triage between treatment options and become a clinically applicable tool, our current findings show that external validation and improved generalizability of the proposed AI framework are necessary before such clinical applications can be realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.