Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608435›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The effects of physical emotion intensity and perceived emotions on trait and ability judgments are non-linear.

Heidi Mauersberger, Shlomo Hareli, Ursula Hess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heidi MauersbergerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 12489, Berlin, Germany. heidi.mauersberger@hu-berlin.de.
Shlomo HareliSchool of Business Administration, University of Haifa, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
Ursula HessDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 12489, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial expressions are important cues for trait inferences, yet most research focuses on intense, prototypical displays, leaving open how observers interpret ambiguous or blended expressions. Across two studies, we examined how anger-sadness morphs shape emotion perception and social judgments, and whether these effects differ by expresser gender. Study 1 revealed categorical perception of anger-sadness blends, with male faces categorized as angry at lower physical anger intensities than female faces. Study 2 showed that female faces were perceived as sadder and male faces as angrier primarily at lower physical anger intensities. Social judgments varied non-linearly with perceived anger and sadness, with the pattern differing by judgment domain and expresser gender. Higher perceived anger predicted greater dominance, lower affiliation, and, for male expressers, greater leadership ability, whereas higher perceived sadness predicted lower dominance and leadership ability. Crucially, gender differences in social judgments were reduced once perceived anger and sadness were taken into account. Thus, anger-sadness morphs reveal socially structured, non-linear patterns of emotion perception and person judgment that may be missed by focusing only on prototypical endpoint expressions.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial ExpressionJudgmentSocial PerceptionAdultAngerFemaleHumansMaleSadnessYoung AdultBlended emotionsExpresser genderFacial expression perceptionNon-linear modelingSocial judgmentTrait attribution

Identifiers

PMID42608435
PMCPMC13483382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.