Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Vegetable-First Meal Sequence Suppresses Postprandial Glycaemic Excursions and Variability in Young Women With High-Risk Phenotype for Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A 4-Arm Randomized Crossover Trial With Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsManaging postprandial glycaemic variability is crucial for preventing metabolic diseases. Although the effects of a vegetable-first meal sequence on blood glucose levels have been well documented, there is limited research on consecutive, repeated meal sequencing for healthy young women. This study investigated the effects of 3-day repeated interventions on glycaemic profiles in this population. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this randomized crossover trial, 33 healthy Korean women consumed isocaloric test meals under four conditions: (1) VPC (vegetables-protein-carbohydrates meal sequence) with 35 min meal limit; (2) CPV (carbohydrates-protein-vegetables meal sequence) with 35 min meal limit; (3) TGR (all together without sequence) with 35 min meal limit; (4) NTL (no meal intake time limit). Glycaemic profiles and variability were examined by continuous glucose monitoring over 3 h after each meal.
resultsCompared to CPV, TGR and NTL, the VPC reduced the glucose incremental area under the curve for 0-1 h and 0-2 h and mean glucose for 0-1 h (p < 0.05). VPC also resulted in lower peak glucose and delayed time-to-peak compared to CPV (p < 0.0001). Time in range was the highest for VPC and VPC significantly reduced the mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion (MAGE) compared to all other sequences (p < 0.05).
conclusionsVPC improves postprandial glycaemic control, demonstrating consistent benefits across different meal constraints, including unrestricted eating (NTL). Optimizing meal sequencing represents a potential strategy for managing metabolic health and preventing early-onset type 2 diabetes in young women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.