ReviewDevelopment, growth & differentiation2026
Revisiting Pluripotency Acquisition: A Unified Framework for Reprogramming Strategies.
Review in Development, growth & differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional hierarchical view of totipotent cells generating diverse lineages of terminally differentiated cells was challenged by the discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). This breakthrough demonstrated that the ectopic expression of four transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM), can reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state. Since then, studies have expanded into diverse reprogramming strategies employing different cell types, factor combinations, delivery methods, and microenvironmental cues, resulting in the generation of diverse pluripotent and multipotent states. iPSCs modeled as canonical pluripotent reprogramming are defined by a core transcriptional network, the capacity for tri-lineage differentiation, and a permissive epigenetic landscape. However, growing evidence has revealed other reprogramming trajectories, including direct lineage reprogramming (or transdifferentiation), atypical pluripotent reprogramming, and noncanonical pluripotent reprogramming-exemplified as bacterial protein-mediated multipotency. Here, we summarize emerging insights of canonical and alternative pluripotent reprogramming strategies to propose a more nuanced framework that views pluripotency as a spectrum of molecular and functional states. These unconventional states often exhibit incomplete erasure of somatic identity, altered regulatory networks, and restricted lineage potential, underscoring the plastic and context-dependent nature of pluripotency. This review aims to reconceptualize fundamental perspectives on the acquisition of pluripotency in mammalian fibroblasts based on recent advances. We delineate the criteria for direct lineage reprogramming, atypical pluripotent reprogramming and noncanonical pluripotent reprogramming, explore novel approaches like bacterial ribosome-mediated cell fate conversion. This study integrates these strategies into a unified resource to enhance conceptual clarity and establishes a platform for advancing regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.