ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
Excitability of posterior root reflex evoked by transcutaneous spinal stimulation is distinct from the H-reflex in the soleus muscle: a pulse duration study.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcutaneous spinal stimulation studies of the lumbosacral posterior root reflex (PRR) have commonly used a 1-ms pulse duration adopted from soleus Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) protocols. However, it remains unknown whether the excitability characteristics of the PRR and H-reflex vary with pulse duration. Twelve neurologically intact participants underwent tibial nerve stimulation to evoke soleus M waves and H-reflexes, and lumbosacral transcutaneous spinal stimulation to evoke soleus PRRs. Recruitment curve data were collected across eight pulse durations (50-2,000 µs). Stimulation intensities corresponding to 50% of the maximum H-reflex were used to construct strength-duration curves for each response type. Rheobase and chronaxie were estimated using the Weiss-Lapicque equation. Maximum peak-to-peak amplitudes of the M wave, H-reflex, and PRR did not differ significantly across pulse duration (with increased stimulation intensity at shorter pulse durations). However, when normalized to the maximum M wave, the PRR was 12.3% larger than the H-reflex. The strength-duration curves were well described by a hyperbolic function, with the PRR exhibiting a substantially higher rheobase (50.8 mA) and shorter chronaxie (338 µs) than the H-reflex (6.7 mA; 874 µs) and M wave (12.5 mA; 545 µs). The maximum soleus PRR and H-reflex do not differ across pulse durations from 50 to 2,000 µs, although shorter pulses require higher stimulation intensities. The differences in PRR and H-reflex rheobase and chronaxie values are likely due to specific electrode configurations, tissue properties, and sites of activation. The excitability characteristics of the soleus PRR and H-reflex have implications for selecting stimulators and their parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.