Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608052›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026

Medication Growth Following Diagnosis of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities at Varying Ages Throughout Childhood.

Robert B Christian, Izabela E Annis, Neal A deJong, Scott A Davis, Phillip M Hughes, Kathleen C Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert B ChristianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Izabela E AnnisUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Neal A deJongDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8638-939X
Scott A DavisUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-9850
Phillip M HughesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University State University of New York, Binghamton, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5472-1677
Kathleen C ThomasUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-5393

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS000032AHRQ HHS T32-HS000032UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize age-related trajectories in psychotropic medication and polypharmacy use among children newly diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), addressing an evidence gap in longitudinal prescribing patterns.

methodsThis study uses a retrospective longitudinal cohort design and commercial insurance claims from the southeast (2011-2021) to study children newly diagnosed with IDD, aged 2-17 years (N = 938). Psychotropic medication use was defined as ≥ 1 prescription fill per year; polypharmacy as ≥ 2 classes used concurrently for ≥ 60 days. Generalized linear mixed models with natural cubic splines describe longitudinal growth trajectories as a function of age at first IDD diagnosis and follow-up year, adjusting for gender, cohort year and region of residence.

resultsWithin 3 years of diagnosis, 40.1% of children initiated psychotropic medication, and 9.4% experienced sustained polypharmacy. Medication use increased with each follow-up year among children diagnosed before age 12. For example, children diagnosed at age 2 had a 2.34-fold increase in medication use by year 3 versus year 1 (95% CI: 1.56-3.53) and nearly a sixfold increase in polypharmacy (OR = 5.89; 95% CI: 2.89-11.99). In contrast, children diagnosed during adolescence showed higher initial use but minimal growth. Psychiatric comorbidities also increased with time, particularly among younger children.

conclusionChildren diagnosed with IDD at younger ages experience steep increases in psychotropic medication use over time, including sustained exposure to polypharmacy. Additional research on long-term benefits and harms of psychiatric medication use is needed.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityPolypharmacyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Psychotropic DrugsAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRetrospective StudiesPsychotropic Drugschildren and adolescentsintellectual and developmental disorderspediatric psychopharmacologypsychopharmacology and polypharmacy trends

Identifiers

PMID42608052
PMCPMC13481131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.