Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608045›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Mapping the longitudinal trajectories of postural control and functional activity after stroke using clinical and sensor-based assessments: protocol of the FOSTER prospective cohort study.

Charlotte Moeyersons, Elissa Embrechts, Britta Hanssen, Mahyar Firouzi, Sylvie De Raedt, Lubos Omelina, Bernard Dan, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Bart Jansen, Marc Degelaen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06806761 (Mapping the Time Course of Recovery of Sitting and Standing Balance and Walking After Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06806761 recruitingnot on this map

Mapping the Time Course of Recovery of Sitting and Standing Balance and Walking After Stroke

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2025 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsStrokeArmsLongitudinal prospective cohort study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte MoeyersonsRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6697-7138
Elissa EmbrechtsRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Britta HanssenRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mahyar FirouziRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Sylvie De RaedtDepartment of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), NEUR Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Lubos OmelinaDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard DanInkendaal Rehabilitation Hospital, Sint-Pieters-Leeuw, Belgium.
Sandra Ortega-MartorellArtificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-3209
Bart JansenDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc DegelaenRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Eva SwinnenRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Eva.Swinnen@vub.be.
TARGET consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, yet recovery trajectories are highly heterogeneous and difficult to predict at the individual level. Standardised clinical assessments primarily capture task accomplishment under controlled conditions but may overlook changes in movement quality, including the distinction between compensatory strategies and behavioural restitution. Additionally, they provide limited insight into the postural control processes that underlie functional task performance. Recent consensus initiatives emphasised the need for sensitive, functionally relevant measures of balance and mobility after stroke. Integrating routine clinical assessments with a sensor-based approach during functional tasks offers new opportunities to characterise recovery more precisely and to map longitudinal trajectories of poststroke change. Within the European Union-funded TARGET project, the FOSTER study aims to generate multimodal data to support data-driven, individualised prognostic models, so-called virtual twins, for personalised rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: FOSTER is a prospective, single-centre observational cohort study at Rehabilitation Hospital Inkendaal (Belgium). We aim to include 100 adults within 8 weeks poststroke, assessed at three to five time points, including an entry assessment after admission and follow-up assessments within predefined windows at approximately 5, 8, 12 and 24 weeks poststroke. The protocol combines synchronised sensor-based measurements during functional tasks (seated reaching, standing reaching and gait initiation) obtained during an exergame, with standardised clinical tests and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Sensors include surface electromyography, inertial measurement units, force plates and markerless motion capture. Sensor-based measurements target movement quality, and anticipatory and reactive postural control during self-initiated functional tasks. Derived outcomes will capture kinetic, kinematic and neuromuscular features of movement strategies, including temporal and asymmetry characteristics. In addition, in-task performance metrics, real-world activity monitoring through accelerometry, standardised clinical assessments and PROMs will be collected to provide a comprehensive, multimodal characterisation of recovery. Linear mixed-effects models will characterise longitudinal trajectories and relationships between clinical and sensor-derived measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The FOSTER study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Rehabilitation Hospital Inkendaal (B.U.N. 2024-TEE-002). Participants will be included after providing informed consent. Data are pseudonymised and stored on a General Data Protection Regulation-compliant platform. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and within the TARGET consortium. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06806761.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesLongitudinal studiesREHABILITATION MEDICINEStroke

Identifiers

PMID42608045
PMCPMC13504868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.