Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608037›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Social marketing for the prevention of physical abuse, emotional abuse and neglect in children: a protocol for a scoping review on applications and strategies.

Fiona Sternberg-Rahenbrock, Lena Rasch, Freia De Bock, Claudia Pischke, Adrienne Alayli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona Sternberg-RahenbrockDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany fiona.sternberg-rahenbrock@hhu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7778-9845
Lena RaschDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9286-2136
Freia De BockDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Claudia PischkeInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Adrienne AlayliDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChild maltreatment (CM) can have significant and long-lasting consequences over the life course. These include long-term physical injuries and an increased risk for mental illness. Preventive applications are critical to reduce maltreatment, promote early detection and initiate early interventions, and prevent further harm. Social marketing (SM) strategies offer a promising approach for the prevention of CM. They use commercial marketing principles to raise awareness and/or influence behaviour of populations for social welfare purposes. To date, there is no comprehensive overview of SM strategies and applications used for prevention, early detection and reduction of harms of physical and emotional child abuse and neglect. This study aims to address this gap by means of a scoping review mapping the national and international literature and to provide an understanding of how SM strategies have been conceptualised and implemented in CM prevention. We chose a scoping review to catalogue and organise the literature, define key constructs and identify gaps, instead of pooling effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC and PsycINFO will be searched for relevant existing literature published between 2010 and 2025 using a search string based on the Population, Concept and Context scheme. Empirical studies examining SM strategies for the prevention of physical and emotional abuse and neglect of all designs will be included.The results will be presented in both narrative and tabular formats. These tables will report on general study characteristics (eg, country, year of publication, study design), key characteristics of SM applications (eg, prevention aims, setting, components, target audiences) and strategies used (eg, media channels, communication formats and theories used). Where reported, we will also summarise evaluations of SM strategies used (eg, study design and outcome measures, main findings).The reporting of the review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews: Checklist and Explanation and PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Literature is used as the only data source, therefore, no ethical approval is required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. They will identify research gaps and will inform a research agenda on integrating SM strategies in the design of preventive applications regarding child physical/emotional abuse and neglect and future evaluations. Our findings can also inform the design of population-level prevention policies and strategies that use SM strategies to raise public awareness of CM and to promote preventive behaviours in everyday settings. STUDY REGISTRATION: A protocol outlining the scoping review has been preregistered at the Open Science Framework (osf preregistration).

Indexed as

Child AbuseEmotional AbusePhysical AbuseSocial MarketingChildHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicChild protectionPAEDIATRICSPrimary PreventionPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42608037
PMCPMC13504512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.