ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2026
Alcohol-aware risk stratification and subtype-specific care pathways across metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease, and alcohol-associated liver disease.
Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Steatotic liver disease spectrum: From MASLD to MetALD and beyond - Clinical outcomes and precision medicine frontiers.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate classification and risk stratification across metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) depend critically on the assessment of alcohol exposure. However, current clinical practice relies largely on self-reported alcohol intake, which may underestimate drinking quantity, pattern, and prior heavy exposure and consequently lead to subtype misclassification. This review focuses on an alcohol-aware approach to steatotic liver disease (SLD) phenotyping and clinical management. We discuss the complementary role of structured alcohol assessment and objective biomarkers, particularly phosphatidylethanol, while emphasizing biological, analytical, and host factors that limit interpretation of a single biomarker value. We further examine how active or recent alcohol exposure modifies the interpretation of commonly used risk-stratification tools, particularly FIB-4 and liver stiffness measurement, and when repeat assessment after alcohol reduction or abstinence may be appropriate. Finally, we propose practical subtype-specific care pathways integrating alcohol exposure, non-invasive fibrosis assessment, and longitudinal reassessment across MASLD, MetALD, and ALD. An alcohol-aware approach may reduce subtype misclassification and enable more appropriate referral, monitoring, and therapeutic decision-making across the SLD spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.