ArticleDiabetes research and clinical practice2026
Association of GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT 2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas with incident cancer in type 2 diabetes.
Article in Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsLimited evidence exists regarding cancer risk associated with non-metformin glucose-lowering medication classes, particularly among obesity-related and obesity-nonrelated cancers.
methodsWe compared cancer risk following initiation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i), or sulfonylureas by emulating a target trial using claims data from Optum Labs Data Warehouse and traditional Medicare (100% sample) among adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk between January 2014 and December 2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated using propensity scores, which were incorporated as inverse probability of treatment weights into proportional hazard models. Primary outcome was any new cancer diagnosis; we secondarily examined cancer subgroups.
resultsAfter inverse probability of treatment weighting, 41,123 patients started GLP-1RA, 54,423 started SGLT2i, 73,803 started DPP4i, and 186,988 started sulfonylureas. GLP-1RA were associated with higher risk of new cancer diagnosis compared to DPP4i (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.05-1.21). SGLT2i (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.82-0.96) and sulfonylureas (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.92) had lower risks of cancer compared to GLP-1RA. Results were driven by obesity-nonrelated cancers, with no difference between study drugs for obesity-related cancers.
conclusionsThe increased risk of obesity-nonrelated cancers following GLP-1RA therapy warrants further investigation and caution among at-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.