ArticleMolecular cell2026
Pervasive noise in human pre-mRNA splice site selection.
Article in Molecular cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA splicing has historically been thought to be highly efficient and accurate, with little opportunity for deviation from regulated alternative splicing. This dogma has been challenged by recent observations that biological noise may contribute substantially to transcriptome diversity. However, quantitative understanding of stochastic splicing variation is challenging because these transcripts are likely subject to rapid degradation. Here, we use deep sequencing across RNA compartments to track splicing intermediates in human cells and see abundant cryptic splicing associated with genomic features that promote splicing noise. We observe pervasive usage of low-fidelity splice sites, likely due to stochasticity in recruitment or binding of the spliceosome. These sites are turned over quickly and show evidence for nuclear and cytoplasmic degradation, suggesting widespread surveillance and rapid quality control of non-productive transcripts. Our findings provide insights into the propensity for error in RNA processing mechanisms and regulation of alternative splice sites across a gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.