ArticleCell systems2026
Interpretable biophysical neural networks of transcriptional activation domains separate roles of protein abundance and coactivator binding.
Article in Cell systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks have improved many difficult prediction tasks in biology, but it remains challenging to interpret these networks and learn the molecular mechanisms. Here, we address interpretation challenges by building biophysical neural networks for predicting activation domains, the regions within transcription factors (TFs) that recruit coactivators to drive gene expression. Deep neural networks can now accurately predict acidic activation domains from protein sequences, but these predictors are difficult to interpret. We designed shallow neural networks that incorporated biophysical models and visualized the parameters directly. We found two ways that the arrangement of residues (i.e., sequence grammar) controls function: (1) C-terminal hydrophobic residues increase coactivator binding and decrease protein abundance, and (2) acidic residues at the N terminus promote coactivator binding, while acidic residues at the C terminus promote TF abundance. We demonstrate how combining biophysical and deep neural networks maximizes prediction accuracy and interpretability, revealing biological mechanisms across datasets. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.