ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2026
Data-Driven Fatigue Trajectories in Multiple Sclerosis and Their Predictors.
Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFatigue is one of the most disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its longitudinal trajectories and determinants remain poorly characterized. We aimed to identify trajectories of cognitive and physical fatigue in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and to determine baseline clinical and MRI predictors of worsening fatigue.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, single-center cohort study embedded in the Predicting Optimal INdividualised Treatment response in MS (POINT-MS) program at the Queen Square MS Centre (London, United Kingdom). Adults with RRMS initiating a new disease-modifying therapy within 3 months of baseline were enrolled and underwent clinical and MRI assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months. Key inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RRMS, availability of baseline brain and cervical spinal cord MRI, and completion of at least 3 Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) assessments. The primary outcome was the longitudinal change in MFIS cognitive and physical subscale scores. Fatigue trajectories were identified using growth mixture modeling. Baseline predictors included demographic factors, disability, cognitive performance, depression diagnosis, proportion of disease duration on disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), and MRI-derived measures of cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (C-CSA) and regional brain volumes standardized to healthy-control norms. Predictor importance was assessed with conditional random forests, followed by multivariable modeling.
resultsWe enrolled 225 participants. Three distinct fatigue trajectories emerged for both cognitive and physical MFIS subscales, including improving, stable/mild-worsening, and worsening classes. Worsening trajectories showed annualized increases of +3.32 points/year (cognitive) and +3.37 points/year (physical). Smaller baseline C-CSA was the strongest MRI predictor of worsening trajectories. Clinically, the proportion of disease duration spent on DMTs was the most influential predictor. DISCUSSION: Fatigue in RRMS follows heterogeneous trajectories over short-term follow-up. Smaller cervical spinal cord area was the strongest MRI predictor of worsening fatigue. Damage to ascending somatosensory axons within the cervical cord may reduce afferent input to the thalamus and diminish thalamocortical drive, contributing to both the motor and the cognitive-arousal dimensions of fatigue. These findings support incorporating cervical cord MRI into prognostic models and future fatigue research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.