ArticleAge and ageing2026
Comparing frailty index distribution, mortality and frailty dynamics across multiple countries: applying the 'zero-state' principle to harmonised ageing data.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFrailty is a dynamic state linked to disability, hospitalisation and mortality. Cross-country comparisons of frailty progression remain limited. We compared frailty distribution, mortality risk and deficit accumulation across 17 middle-/high-income countries. We then examined whether outcomes among individuals with minimal baseline deficits ('zero-state') reflect broader population health patterns to explore utility of the 'zero-state' as a marker of population health.
methodsData were from five harmonised longitudinal ageing surveys (Health and Retirement Survey, Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey, Mexican Health and Ageing Study). A 31-item frailty index (FI) was constructed using identical variables at baseline, 2- and 4-year follow-up. Participants with <2 deficits were classified as in 'zero-state'. Outcomes: all-cause mortality and FI change among survivors. Logistic regression (mortality) and negative binomial models (deficit accumulation) were adjusted for age, sex and baseline FI. Analyses were stratified by zero-state and non-zero-state.
resultsBaseline frailty varied between countries: highest in the USA, Mexico and Southern/Eastern European nations, and lowest in Northern/Central Europe. Mortality and deficit accumulation differed substantially. Mexico showed highest mortality and fastest accumulation, while Switzerland and Scandinavian countries showed the lowest. Zero-state analyses revealed larger between-country differences, but lower statistical power, than analyses of those with higher FI. Some countries (e.g. USA, UK) showed favourable zero-state outcomes but more rapid progression among individuals with higher baseline FI.
conclusionFrailty distribution, mortality and frailty progression vary widely across settings, with poorer outcomes in lower-income countries. Zero-state trajectories capture important population differences but do not fully reflect patterns among those with existing frailty, potentially reflecting within-country inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.