Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42607191›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

A kinematic convergence in ape and monkey vertical climbing informs debates on early hominin arborealism.

Luke D Fannin, Carmen Pape, W Scott McGraw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke D FanninDepartment of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-4442
Carmen PapeDepartment of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
W Scott McGrawDepartment of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.ORCID 0000-0003-1986-7408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent debates on early hominin arborealism center around interpretations of fossilized foot bones as being either "African ape"- or "monkey"- like in their morphology. These dueling interpretations fuel competing locomotor reconstructions of the last common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans (LCA), including disagreements about the prevalence of vertical climbing behaviors. Yet it remains unclear if possessing an ape- or monkey-like foot impacts the safety and efficiency of climbing, in part because few kinematic data exist on cercopithecoid monkeys moving in their natural habitats. Here, we present detailed kinematic data on the feet of a prolific vertically-climbing cercopithecoid monkey (

Indexed as

Cercocebus atysHominidaeLocomotionAnimalsBiological EvolutionBiomechanical PhenomenaFootFossilsHumansPan troglodytesAustralopithecusCLCAmidfoot breakvertical climbing

Identifiers

PMID42607191
PMCPMC13535176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.