ArticlePloS one2026
Overground running incurs a higher energetic cost than treadmill running at a 1% grade: A comparison of running economy, oxygen cost of transport, and energy cost in endurance athletes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the physiological and metabolic demands of treadmill and overground running by examining running economy (RE), oxygen cost of transport (O2-COT), and energy cost (EC) across ventilatory threshold-scaled intensities in trained endurance athletes. Twelve male runners (21.3±2.4 years; 176.2±6.8 cm; 67.8±5.9 kg) completed a ramp test to determine V̇O2max, followed by identical stepwise protocols (8-15 km·h1¹; 3-min stages) performed indoors on a treadmill and outdoors on a 400 m track. Breath-by-breath gas exchange was averaged over the final 60-90 s of each stage to determine steady-state V̇O2. Within-subject comparisons were used to evaluate differences between field and treadmill running across exercise intensities. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of Condition and Intensity domain for all three primary outcomes (all p≤0.012). RE was significantly higher during overground running (51.3±2.2 vs. 49.6±3.1 mL·kg1¹·min1¹; p-FDR=0.01), with divergence occurring primarily at intensities between 70% and 100% of VT2. O2-COT was consistently greater during overground running across all intensity domains (204.2±11.3 vs. 197.1±12.3 mL·kg1¹·km1¹; p-FDR≤0.01), with no significant Condition×Intensity interaction, indicating a consistent between-condition difference across all intensity domains. Energy cost remained consistently higher during overground running (3.87±0.21 to 4.60±0.27 vs. 3.65±0.22 to 4.10±0.18 J·kg1¹·m1¹; p-FDR<0.001), with a significant Condition×Intensity interaction (p=0.045). Carbohydrate oxidation was significantly higher during overground running at intensities approaching VT2 (p-FDR=0.02). These findings suggest that the commonly used 1% treadmill grade correction does not fully replicate the energetic demands of overground running, with implications for laboratory-based performance evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.