Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42607056›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Observing teaching principles in school - Development and Validation of an Observation Protocol (OPTIS).

Theres Mühlberg, Joachim Bachner, Filip Mess, Jan Schmid-Ellinger

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theres MühlbergTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Associate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Am Olympiacampus, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9527-0754
Joachim BachnerTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Associate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Am Olympiacampus, Munich, Germany.
Filip MessTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Associate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Am Olympiacampus, Munich, Germany.
Jan Schmid-EllingerTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Associate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Am Olympiacampus, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructional quality seems to have a considerable impact on students' achievements. Unpacking instructional quality through observation is an increasingly used method in educational research. Although a great variety of observational measurements for school observation are available, there is a lack of a valid, reliable, and subject-independent observation protocols. Furthermore, observation protocols that do not solely serve evaluation purposes, and are based on a constructivist learning tradition and a comparative literature analysis of existing teaching principles are missing. This study aims to address this lack by developing an observation protocol that helps observers to identify the applied teaching principles during class. The developmental validation process of the observation protocol Observing Principles of Teaching In School (OPTIS) is detailed, and the piloting via video-recorded and real-time teaching is described. Inter- and intra-observer reliability, computed with Gwet's AC2, for two independent observers achieved an almost perfect agreement. Several expert rounds and theoretical foundations provided evidence for high predictive validity. Overall, test- and piloting results present evidence regarding the psychometric properties of the OPTIS protocol.

Indexed as

SchoolsTeachingHumansLearningReproducibility of ResultsStudents

Identifiers

PMID42607056
PMCPMC13480659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.