Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42607054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Serum periostin levels in myocardial infarction: Findings from forensic autopsy cases.

Atsushi Yamada, Kana Unuma, Osamu Kitamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atsushi YamadaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo (ST), Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7598-5877
Kana UnumaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo (ST), Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1241-5217
Osamu KitamuraDepartment of Legal Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains one of the leading causes of sudden death with significant implications in both clinical and forensic practice. In forensic settings, AMI diagnosis traditionally relies on gross and histopathological findings. However, when ischemic changes are subtle or insufficiently developed, various cardiac biomarkers have been investigated to support postmortem diagnosis. Periostin, a matricellular protein involved in tissue remodeling and repair, has recently garnered attention for its role in cardiac pathology. Emerging evidence suggests that serum periostin may be a valuable biomarker for assessing cardiac injury and predicting outcomes after AMI. This study aimed to evaluate serum periostin levels in forensic autopsy cases of AMI. The subjects were 80 autopsy cases, categorized into AMI (n = 46), fatal asthma (n = 16), and traumatic deaths (n = 18). Serum periostin levels were significantly elevated in AMI compared with asthma and trauma cases, with median values of 728.50 ng/mL (IQR 465.25-1139.75) in AMI, 410.50 ng/mL (IQR 253.00-756.00) in asthma, and 386.50 ng/mL (IQR 229.75-532.50) in trauma. Serum periostin showed no significant correlation with postmortem interval and was minimally influenced by patients' characteristics or comorbidities. These findings provide baseline data on serum periostin levels in forensic autopsy cases and suggest that periostin measurement may assist in the postmortem evaluation of AMI.

Indexed as

Cell Adhesion MoleculesMyocardial InfarctionPeriostinAdultAgedAsthmaAutopsyBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersCell Adhesion MoleculesPeriostinPOSTN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID42607054
PMCPMC13480611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.