ArticlePloS one2026
Beyond domestication: The unexpected contribution of native Musa wild relatives to cultivated banana diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diversity of cultivated bananas remains partially unknown, whereas cultivars with suitable adaptive traits could address the drastically increasing biotic and abiotic constraints on banana production. This partial knowledge also impacts our understanding of domestication processes, although replicating these processes is an endorsed strategy for banana varietal improvement. To address this gap, 91 specimens were collected during a collecting mission across northern Vietnam, northern Laos, and China's Yunnan region, an underexplored area at the northern limit of the Musa natural range. Native wild relatives were also collected (Musa acuminata subsp. burmannica, M. balbisiana, M. itinerans, M. yunnanensis) to assess their potential contributions to cultivated crops. SNP polymorphisms revealed that, beyond the globally cultivated sweet or starchy cultivars, farmers cultivate numerous previously undescribed landraces. SNP-based chromosome paintings further showed that all these landraces carry genomic signatures from endemic wild Musa relatives. Notably, Musa acuminata subsp. burmannica, typically regarded as a minor contributor to cultivated bananas, was detected in several M. acuminata derived diploids (AA) and triploids (AAA) as well as M. acuminata × M. balbisiana derived AAB and ABB landraces. Remarkably, we also report here for the first time polyploid landraces containing a complete haplotype of the local M. itinerans. Crucially, we showed that these landraces were not directly domesticated from the endemic wild Musa. They appear to result from local hybridizations of endemic wilds with exogenous AA diploids introduced into Mainland Southeast Asia from distant regions and originating from earlier domestication farther south. In addition, the various M. acuminata subspecies contributing to these exogenous diploids, provide arguments for an alternative eastern route of introduction via southern China or Taiwan and through the Philippines, distinct from the previously described western route via the Malay Peninsula, through Java, and Sumatra. We highlight an accumulation of genomic introgressions from native wild relatives, suggesting that banana diversity was shaped by an atypical process of cumulative diversification. This 'post-domestication' process is thought to enhance local adaptation through genes pyramiding. This multi-level genetic stacking is strengthened in bananas by polyploidy and vegetative propagation fixing any valuable combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.