Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42607025›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Acceptability of breast cancer risk assessment for women aged 30-49: Views of women from six under-served groups.

Victoria G Woof, Maria Valasaki, Francisca Stutzin Donoso, Lorna McWilliams, Helen Morley, Juliet Usher-Smith, David P French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria G WoofManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4069-5188
Maria ValasakiThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8786-9731
Francisca Stutzin DonosoThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lorna McWilliamsManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Helen MorleyManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Juliet Usher-SmithThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David P FrenchManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-7804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequalities in breast screening uptake and cancer outcomes persist among under-served women. To reduce disparities, it is essential to understand women's views when developing proactive early detection and prevention services. This study explored the acceptability of introducing a breast cancer risk assessment service for women aged 30-49, offering early screening and/or risk-reducing medication to those at moderate or high-risk. We conducted extensive engagement with six communities of typically under-served women, selected to represent diverse and overlapping sources of disadvantage: (1) South Asian Muslim women, (2) Black women, (3) Roma women, (4) women in low socio-economic neighbourhoods, (5) women with learning disabilities and/or autism, and (6) women with long-term anxiety and/or depression. Fifty-two women participated in 10 focus groups and one interview. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach. All groups were enthusiastic about a breast cancer risk assessment for young women. Across groups, female healthcare staff, local delivery, a straightforward process, and assurances about data privacy were valued to reduce barriers and promote engagement. Women also supported local events to promote risk assessment and breast cancer awareness. Concerns about the emotional impact of risk information highlighted the need for clear communication and tailored support across groups. Among ethnic minority women, breast cancer was often seen as taboo, limiting discussion and complicating the sharing of family history. These findings highlight that under-served women face both shared and unique challenges. To enhance uptake and reduce longstanding early detection inequalities, risk assessment services should be culturally sensitive, streamlined, and supported by community-based awareness initiatives.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID42607025
PMCPMC13480479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.