ArticlePloS one2026
Variations in ray flower numbers of Common Daisy (Bellis perennis L.) - the hidden cues of the Fibonacci order.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, I provide empirical evidence on the number of ray flowers in Bellis perennis L. to evaluate the widely accepted assumption that floral architecture and other natural phenomena follow numerical sequences such as the Fibonacci order. The aim is to contribute to a broader understanding of the mathematical principles underlying the organization of natural systems, particularly the interplay between deterministic patterns and inherent stochasticity. Between April and May 2024, a total of n = 563 Bellis perennis individuals were sampled across 34 distinct populations in the Federal State of Brandenburg, northeastern Germany. The number of ray flowers per individual follows a well-defined probabilistic distribution that is best described by the discrete negative binomial type II model and the continuous inverse gamma probability density function. While most individuals exhibit ray flower counts between 34 and 56, a pronounced frequency peak occurs between 40 and 48, with a mode of 42 and a median of 46, both stable across spatial and temporal sampling conditions. Notably, there are two distinct local deviations identified by both theoretical distributions that occur at ray flower counts of 34 and 55, corresponding precisely to two values from the Fibonacci sequence. These deviations are neither pure statistical outliers nor indicators of multimodality; rather, they represent mathematically constructible features within a stochastic framework. To characterize this phenomenon, I introduce the concept of "improbable recurrency", referring to deterministic structures that emerge from, and are only detectable within, inherent stochastic patterns of natural systems. Improbable recurrency exemplifies the co-constitutive relationship between stochasticity and determinism, forming a shared quantitative logic through which the human mind interprets biological complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.