ArticleJournal of global health2026
Mapping the landscape of congenital anomaly registries worldwide: what role do health and economic factors play?
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital anomalies (CAs) are structural or functional changes occurring during intrauterine life. The World Health Organization data indicate that about 295,000 babies die within the first four weeks of birth due to CAs every year. It has been estimated that approximately 94% of severe CAs occur in low- and middle-income and low-income countries. While the use of a national congenital anomaly registry (CAR) can help improve healthcare quality, access, and planning for families and children born with CAs, few countries report using such a system. We aimed to evaluate the correlation of health and economic indicators with the existence of national CARs. Methods: We compiled data on individual countries' reported CAR status from regional networks, the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, the Modell database, and a literature search. We classified countries according to the reported CAR status into those that reported having a national CAR with or without regional CAR, only a regional CAR, and no CAR data available. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, we analysed whether a country's CAR status was correlated with health and economic data from UNICEF and the World Bank. Results: Of the 202 countries in our sample, 30 reported having a national CAR, 19 only a regional CAR, and 153 no CAR. Country income group-level analysis showed that 35.4% of high-income, 13.2% of upper middle-income, and 0% of low- and middle-income, and 0% low-income countries were reported to have national CARs. Countries lacking a national CAR tended to have a lower gross domestic product (P < 0.001), increased infant mortality rates (P < 0.001), and lower birth registration rates (P < 0.001). Conclusions: While the importance of CARs for improving global health is widely recognised, most LMICs and LICs still do not report having a national CAR. Our study suggests that countries without CARs face greater economic and health systems challenges. Collaborations to develop national CARs need to consider the impact of these wider economic and health systems challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.