ArticleJAMA network open2026
Health System Policies Following State Abortion Restrictions in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: One in 3 US women of reproductive age live in states that restrict abortion. Total or near-total abortion bans exempt cases where the health or life of the pregnant person is threatened. However, exemptions are ambiguously defined, and abortion practitioners risk criminal prosecution if they are judged after the fact to have performed a prohibited abortion. Objective: To describe hospital policies and practices for exempted abortions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Qualitative study conducted between June and December 2025. The top 5 hospitals by birth volume in abortion-restrictive states (hospitals in states with total or 6-week abortion bans as of June 2025) were identified and participants from 1 hospital per state who were responsible for making or implementing hospital abortion policies were sequentially enrolled. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two coders conducted content analysis of semistructured interviews investigating how hospitals remained apprised of current state laws, supported evidence-based exempted abortion care and reproductive care, and protected clinicians. Results: Thirty-four participants from 9 hospitals (mean [SD] annual live births, 5257 [3289]) across 9 states were most commonly physicians (16 participants [47.0%]) or hospital administrators (10 participants [29.4%]). Participants identified the following hospital policies or practices as supporting evidence-based reproductive care within legal constraints: (1) providing criminal defense resources for physicians; (2) implementing additional employee protections, such as online threat monitoring, contractual indemnity clauses, and coverage for out-of-state abortions for employees; (3) explicitly aligning institutional definitions of abortion with the fullest extent of care permitted under state law to avoid unnecessarily restrictive care; (4) formalizing decision-making support for exempted abortions (eg, multidisciplinary committees); (5) building intrastate hospital alliances to standardize interpretation of state laws banning abortion; and (6) engaging in legislative advocacy and strategic litigation to maximize reproductive care. Participants reported multiple policy effects, including greater employee retention and recruitment and more timely and expansive reproductive care. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of 9 high birth-volume hospitals in 9 abortion-restrictive states, institutions implemented policies to protect their employees and support the fullest extent of legally permissible, evidence-based reproductive care. Identified policies may be instructive to other hospitals that provide legally contested medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.