Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42606803›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026

Examining Explicit and Implicit Caste Bias Among Healthcare Providers in India.

Shivani Yadav, Krishna Ram

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shivani YadavDelhi Technological University, New Delhi, India. shivaniyadav@dtu.ac.in.
Krishna RamAmbedkar University Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare provisioning reflects the social context in which it operates, where caste-based identities and hierarchies continue to shape institutional behaviour and care delivery. Drawing on social identity theory and research on implicit bias, this study examines how caste - a rigid, hereditary, and endogamous status hierarchy, structures explicit and implicit attitudes among public healthcare providers in India. Using structured survey measures, open-ended responses, and the Implicit Association Test (IAT), we collected data from 106 providers across public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh. Results indicate widespread caste bias: over 60% of providers expressed explicit opposition to affirmative action policies benefiting Scheduled Castes (SC), and 75% of IAT participants demonstrated an automatic preference for Forward Castes. These attitudes were more pronounced among non-SC providers, while SC participants showed greater awareness and sensitivity towards caste discrimination. Beyond documenting prejudice, the study demonstrates how structural inequality and professional discretion interact in resource-constrained institutional settings. The findings highlight how implicit and explicit caste attitudes may operate as micro-level mechanisms reproducing health inequities, even in formally egalitarian public systems. Policy implications include integrating caste-sensitivity training in medical education, strengthening institutional accountability, and diversifying the healthcare workforce to mitigate bias in clinical interactions.

Indexed as

Caste hierarchyHealthcare inequalityImplicit biasInstitutional discrimination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.