ArticleInsights into imaging2026
A comprehensive framework for multi-class prostate cancer classification using biparametric MRI: a multi-center retrospective study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAccurate pre-biopsy or preoperative diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer remain challenging. This study aimed to develop an automated framework for prostate and suspicious lesion segmentation, feature extraction, and multiclass classification of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study enrolled 2543 patients with suspected clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). An nnUNet was used for prostate segmentation, followed by suspected lesion identification and feature extraction. Unimodal and multimodal deep learning models were trained to classify patients into non-csPCa (benign/ISUP 1), mid-risk csPCa (ISUP 2-3), and high-risk csPCa (ISUP 4-5). Subsequently, we extracted prostate radiomics, lesion radiomics, and learned features from the unimodal DL model. Radiomics features, learned features from the unimodal deep learning model, and clinical variables were integrated to develop machine-learning classifiers. The best-performing model was compared with conventional clinical variables and evaluated across subgroups defined by PSA levels and PI-RADS 4.
resultsThe nnUNet achieved scores of 0.971 in internal validation and 0.934 in external testing. The optimal machine learning model, which integrated all features, achieved a macro-AUC of 0.87 [0.84-0.90] across both internal and external evaluations. Further comparisons indicate it outperforms traditional metrics such as total PSA, PSAD, and PI-RADS. Additionally, it exhibits strong robustness in most subgroup analyses, consistently surpassing conventional variables.
conclusionWe developed an automated bpMRI-based framework that segments the prostate and suspicious lesions and enables multiclass risk stratification of prostate cancer by integrating imaging and clinical features. The proposed approach demonstrated strong performance and robustness, outperforming conventional clinical variables. KEY POINTS: Question accurate pre-biopsy stratification of prostate cancer is essential for clinical decision-making. Current studies predominantly focus on binary classification of csPCa, and multi-class classification remains challenging. Findings the comprehensive framework achieved an area under the curve of 0.87 in both internal and external tests, exceeding clinical variables and demonstrating robustness. Critical relevance statement this study presents a robust multi-class classification framework based on biparametric MRI and machine learning to improve pre-biopsy prostate cancer stratification, outperform conventional metrics, and provide a valuable tool for risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.