ArticleDiscover nano2026
Nanoscale heat evaluation performance using hybrid nanocomposites along vertical riga surface under robin boundary and transient concept.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The heat transfer through Riga surface associated to Robin condition and transient effects is an interesting topic. The primary objectives of this work are to model a heat transfer problem for vertical Riga surface using hybrid nanocomposite properties, along with thermal radiation, mixed convection and unsteady effects. The problem governs the flow transformed into dimensionless form with the help of similarity transformations, and enhanced properties of nanofluids. The model novelty falls in the development of superior tetra nanofluid class and its comparison with traditional classes (ternary, hybrid and simple) by integrating the aforementioned parameters. After that, the RK numerical scheme is applied for the solution and the results plotted by varying the physical parameters (thermal radiation, Biot number, unsteady and mixed convection parameters). The findings reveal that Biot number from 0.2 to 0.8, thermal radiation parameter from 0.1 to 0.7, and nanoparticles concentration from 1 to 4% promisingly increases the temperature with maximum increase in tetra nanofluid case than ternary, hybrid and simple cases. However, strengthening the mixed convection (δ) from 0.01 to 0.04 and magnetic effects due to Riga surface controls the temperature significantly. The skin friction against [Formula: see text] from 1 to 4% shows variations from 1.0214 to 1.0051 (tetra), 1.1290 to 1.1179 (ternary), 1.1385 to 1.1304 (hybrid), and 1.1786 to 1.1740 for traditional nanofluid. The comparative heat transfer gradient improves for strong Biot number effects and enhances from 0.2707 to 0.440 (tetra), 0.1233 to 0.3915 (ternary), 0.1150 to 0.3671 (hybrid) and 0.1109 to 0.3536 for simple nanofluid with promising increase in tetra nanofluid. The comparative findings reveal key role of tetra nanofluid for heat transfer while the less thermal efficiency is investigated for other classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.